Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Sulphur  (Read 611 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« on: December 23, 2018, 04:43:00 AM »

Model Number 102
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
Event Date 04/02/2015
Event Type  Death   
Event Description
The autopsy finding were listed as clinical history of rett syndrome with a history of uncontrolled seizures, musculature atrophy of extremities, scoliosis; pulmonary congestion/edema; history that the decedent was found unresponsive in a prone position in bed. The conclusion was noted to be that the decedent died as a result of a seizure disorder associated with rett syndrome. The manner of death was listed as natural.

Event Description
Analysis of the generator was completed on (b)(6) 2015. The module performed according to functional specifications. There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator. Analysis of the lead was completed on (b)(6) 2015. Note that the majority of the lead assembly (body) including the electrodes was not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy - provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, zirconium, aluminum, sulphur and calcium. The condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified.

Event Description
It was reported that the vns patient passed away. The funeral home indicated that the device was explanted by the medical examiner and would be returned for analysis. The medical examiner's office indicated that the autopsy is pending, but would be provided when completed. The explanted generator and lead were received for analysis. Analysis is underway, but has not been completed to date. No additional relevant information has been received to date.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=4772129
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2018, 04:44:20 AM »

Model Number 300-20
Event Date 02/22/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.

Event Description
Reporter indicated via the manufacturer¿s implant card that the patient had vns generator and lead replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2013 due to ¿increased seizures¿, and that a new model 104 vns generator was ¿wasted, inserted, and removed¿ but not implanted at the surgery. Attempts for additional information and return of the explanted devices are in progress.

Event Description
Reporter indicated high lead impedance was observed for a patient at an office visit on (b)(6) 2013. Approximately two to three weeks prior to the office visit, the patient began experiencing dizziness, not feeling vns stimulation, and the patient's seizures were described as "different". The vns was disabled and x-rays were performed but will not be sent to the manufacturer. Vns diagnostics were last within normal limits in (b)(6) 2013. The patient had no known trauma and does not manipulate the vns. The patient is active is sports. The reporter feels the vns lead may be broken and causing the change in seizures, dizziness, and stimulation not perceived. No programming or medication changes preceded these issues. Surgery to replace the vns lead and generator is likely, but has not occurred to date.

Event Description
The explanted lead and generator were returned to the manufacturer on (b)(4) 2013 and are pending product analysis.

Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death.

Event Description
On (b)(4) 2013 product analysis was completed on the lead. During the visual analysis of the returned 47mm portion quadfilar coil 1 appeared to be broken approximately 12mm and 14mm from the end of the cut inner silicone tubing. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on quadfilar coil 1 coil break (found at 12mm) and identified the area as having extensive pitting which prevented identification of the coil fracture type with mechanical damage. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on quadfilar coil 1 coil break (found at 14mm) and identified the area as having evidence of being worn to the point of fracture which prevented identification of the coil fracture type with fine pitting. Flat spots and pitting were observed on the coil surface. During the visual analysis of the returned 58mm portion the (+) white electrode quadfilar coil appeared to be broken at the end of the abraded open / cut outer silicone tubing. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as having extensive pitting and mechanical damage which prevented identification of the coil fracture type. It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting. Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution. The abraded openings found on the outer and inner silicone tubes, most likely provided the leakage path for what appeared to be remnants of dried body fluids found inside the outer and inner silicone tubes. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, aluminum, sulphur and calcium. With the exception of the observed discontinuities, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pins provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified. Product analysis on the generator was completed on (b)(4) 2013. Review of the data indicated that the pulsedisabled byte was set to a value that represents a vbat

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3050791
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2018, 04:45:13 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 07/01/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
The generator and lead were returned for analysis. Analysis of the generator was completed on 11/06/2013. The device performed according to functional specifications. Analysis of the generator in the pa lab concluded that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found. Analysis of the lead was completed on 11/12/2013. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy - provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, zirconium, sulphur, aluminum and calcium. The condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified.

Manufacturer Narrative
Device manufacturing records were reviewed. Review of manufacturing records of the lead confirmed all quality tests were passed prior to distribution. Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.

Event Description
It was reported that generator replacement surgery the surgeon inspected the lead and found that there was a calcified area on the lead. It was reported that the part of the lead that had the calcified area appeared to be cracked and damage. The surgeon decided to replace the lead also. The explanted devices are expected to be returned for analysis, but have not been received to date.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3347595
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2018, 05:38:19 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 01/22/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
Additional information was received on (b)(6) 2013 reporting that the patient's mother indicated that vns therapy was not working properly for the patient which the physician attributed to the loss of vns therapy due to the high impedance. The physician reported that after the patient's generator replacement on (b)(6) 2012, everything was going well. Once the high impedance was observed at a follow-up visit, the mother complained that the vns magnet was not functioning as it was before and the patient]'s seizures were increasing in frequency and severity. The events began (b)(6) 2012. The physician believes the increased seizures frequency and severity, in addition to the magnet no longer appearing to function as before, was likely related to loss of vns therapy. With the therapy, the patient had seizure reduction around 20%. The length of the seizure and the reduction of post-ictal state was noticeable and was the most benefit from vns therapy. At the time of the high impedance, no further reduction in seizures was noted. No medication changes preceded the seizure changes, and the patient is reported to be adherent to the medication schedule. At this time medication doses have been risen, but the seizure frequency and intensity remains nearly the same per the physician.

Event Description
The physician reported that during a follow-up appointment for the vns patient, high lead impedance was found on system and mode normal diagnostics. The reported impedance value was greater than 10,000 ohms. The physician disabled the patient's device and ordered a x-ray of site the device implantation. The patient´s mother told the physician that the patient did not suffer any trauma or manipulation that is believed to have contributed to the high impedance. The patient previously had a generator replacement on (b)(6) 2012. No patient adverse events have been reported. Ap and lateral views of the chest and ap and lateral views of the neck were reviewed by the manufacturer. The x-ray film images were dated (b)(6) 2013. Due to the angle of the x-ray it cannot be confirmed whether the lead pin is fully inserted into the generator header. The feed-thru wires appear to be intact. The lead appears to be routed upwards to the left side of the neck. The electrodes are visualized in the neck and appear to be aligned. There is a portion of the lead behind the generator; therefore, this portion of lead cannot be assessed for continuity. Based on the x-rays images received, there are no gross lead fractures that can be visualized. However, the presence of an unpronounced lead discontinuity cannot be ruled out. Although surgery is likely, the surgery has not occurred to date.

Event Description
The patient had surgery on (b)(6) 2013. It was reported that during surgery the surgeon found a lot of fibrosis involving the generator and the route of the vagus nerve. Extraction of the generator was very difficult due to the fibrosis. After 30 minutes, the surgeon was able to remove the generator. The surgeon then loosened the screw of the lead pin from the generator. A generator diagnostic test was performed and resulted in results within normal limits. The lead pin was re-inserted, and system diagnostics resulted in high impedance again twice with impedance greater than 10,000 ohms. The surgeon suspects that fibrosis between the vagus nerve and the lead due to intra-operative findings. The surgeon removed a lot of the fibrous tissue but did not touch the nerve because the route of the vagus nerve was fibrosed, and it was difficult to assess. The patient had keloid tissue around the scar areas. The patient was put on corticoids in the area of the generator to prevent serious injury. He ordered a mri of the neck with the surgery findings and report of mri, the surgeon is referring the patient for lead replacement in another procedure. Neither the generator or lead were explanted/replaced. Although surgery may occur, it has not occurred to date. The high impedance was reported to have occurred about one month after generator replacement which occurred on (b)(6) 2012.

Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer reviewed x-rays of implanted device. X-rays reviewed by the manufacturer, no gross lead discontinuities visualized.

Manufacturer Narrative
Suspect medical device, corrected data: after review of additional x-rays, the suspect device is the generator. Suspect medical device, corrected data: after review of additional x-rays, the suspect device is the generator, so the initial report inadvertently reported the date incorrectly. Manufacturer reviewed chest x-rays of implant device. X-rays reviewed by the manufacturer, lead pin not fully inserted past the connector block of generator.

Event Description
Although surgery is likely, it has not occurred to date. The patient's family has elected to move forward with surgery.

Manufacturer Narrative
Review of device history records performed. Review of the lead device history records confirmed all quality tests were passed prior to distribution.

Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death.

Event Description
A mri was performed on (b)(6) 2013 per manufacturing labeling precautions, but the surgeon reported that the mri report was not conclusive for the report of fibrosis in the patient¿s neck. The patient is therefore being referred for surgery. Although surgery is likely, it has not occurred to date.

Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event, corrected data: the supplemental report inadvertently reported the date of the high impedance being first observed incorrectly.

Event Description
Additional information was received indicating the patient's family is evaluating the patient's benefit to vns prior to referral for surgery. Normal and system diagnostics on (b)(6) 2013 resulted in high lead impedance (>10,000 ohms). The device was turned off on (b)(6) 2013. Another set of x-rays were performed. Ap and lateral view of the chest x-rays were reviewed by the manufacturer. Based on the x-rays images received, there are no gross lead fractures that can be visualized. However, the presence of an unpronounced lead discontinuity cannot be ruled out. Additionally, the lead pin appears to not be fully inserted in the generator header which is the likely cause of the high impedance. Attempts for additional information have been unsuccessful to date.

Event Description
Additional information was received that the patient had the vns lead replacement on (b)(6) 2013. The surgery came out ok and the high impedance was resolved. The explanted lead was returned to the manufacturer and product analysis was performed. During the visual analysis the returned 417mm portion the (-) green electrode quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 1mm from the electrode bifurcation. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the connector end of the (-) green electrode quadfilar coil break (found at 1mm) and identified the area on three of the quadfilar coil strands as having evidence of a stress induced fracture (fatigue appearance) with mechanical damage and no pitting. The area on the fourth broken coil strand was identified as having evidence of a stress induced fracture (fatigue appearance) with mechanical damage, no pitting and evidence of a stress indu ced fracture (torsional appearance) which most likely completed the fracture. Pitting and residual material were observed on the coil surface. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the electrode (mating) end of the (-) green electrode quadfilar coil break (found at 1mm) and identified the area as having extensive pitting which prevented identification of the coil fracture type with mechanical damage and residual material. It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting. Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution. The abraded opening found on the outer silicone tubing, most likely provided the leakage path for what appeared to be remnants of dried body fluids found inside the outer silicone tubing. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy - provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, zirconium, sulphur and calcium. With the exception of the observed discontinuity, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted except for the set of setscrew marks found near the end of the connector pin indicating the lead had not been fully inserted into the cavity of the generator at one time. Additional setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified. Based on the findings in the product analysis lab, there is evidence to suggest a discontinuity in the returned portions of the device.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=2967697
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2018, 05:40:57 AM »

Model Number 104
Event Date 07/09/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
Additional information was received that product analysis was completed on the generator and lead. The pulse generator was interrogated at multiple orientations adjacent to the programming wand, with a one inch spacer between the pulse generator and the programming wand. The pulse generator interrogated at all orientations. In the pa lab, the device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment. Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator¿s output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period. The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters. In addition, a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications as defined in ets 28-0000-3300/2. The battery, 2. 952 volts as measured during completion of test parameter 7. 16. 10. 2 (measured diagvbat) of the final electrical test, shows a non-ifi condition. The data in the diagaccumconsumed memory locations revealed that 15. 884% of the battery had been consumed. There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator. Note that a portion of the lead assembly (body) including the electrodes was not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sulphur, sodium, magnesium and calcium. The condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No obvious anomalies were noted. The resistance measurements taken during decontamination verified an electrical and mechanical contact between the generator and connector pins at one point in time. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, with no discontinuities identified. Based on the findings in the product analysis lab, there is no evidence to suggest an anomaly with the returned portions of the device. Note that since a portion of the lead assembly (body) including the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.

Event Description
It was initially reported that the patient was having her device explanted due to having pseudo-seizures and anxiety. The physician did not think the patient was a good candidate for vns therapy originally. Clinic notes dated (b)(6) 2013 reported that the patient¿s vns generator was checked and it appeared to be ¿malfunctioning. ¿ the physician reported in the notes that excessive stimulation was provided, and he was unable to program the settings down. Therefore, the vns magnet was taped over the device to disable the stimulation. The physician noted that it was desired to have the device explanted anyway, so she was referred for surgery. Previously on (b)(6) 2013, the patient asked to have her vns settings turned down. The physician turned the settings down to 0. 75 ma with the plan to turn it off at the next visit in two months. Patient was admitted to medical center on (b)(6) 2013 and discharged on (b)(6) 2013 due to recurrent seizures. Eeg confirmed that the patient does not have epileptic seizures. Attempts to the physician for additional information on not being able to program the device settings down have been unsuccessful to date. The patient was originally implanted with vns in 2001 but had generator replacement in 2010. The patient had generator and lead explant on 07/26/2013. The explanted products were received by the manufacturer on 08/01/2013. However, analysis has not been completed to date. The return product form indicated reason for explant was "patient desired. ".

Manufacturer Narrative
Review of device history records. Review of the generator device history records confirmed all quality tests were passed prior to distribution.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3267316
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #5 on: December 29, 2018, 01:40:43 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 05/30/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Manufacturer Narrative
Device manufacturing records were reviewed. Review of manufacturing records confirmed there were no unresolved non conformances found with the generator and lead prior to distribution.

Event Description
Analysis of the lead was completed on 04/17/2014. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the connector end of the (+) connector ring quadfilar coil break (found at 63mm) and identified the area on three of the broken coil strands as being mechanically damaged with fine pitting which prevented identification of the coil fracture type and residual material. Pitting was observed on the coil surface. The remaining broken coil strand was identified as having the appearance of being melted, with re-solidified material (evidence of being melted at one time). Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the electrode (mating) end of the (+) connector ring quadfilar coil break (found at 63mm) and identified the area on two of the broken coil strands as being mechanically damaged with fine pitting which prevented identification of the coil fracture type. Pitting was observed on the coil surface. The remaining broken coil strands were identified as having the appearance of being melted, with re-solidified material (evidence of being melted at one time). Pitting was observed on one of the coil melt areas. What appeared to be spatter was found on the quadfilar coil strand. It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting. Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution. The abraded openings found on the outer and (+) connector ring inner silicone tubes most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the outer and (+) inner silicone tubes. For the observed (-) connector pin inner tubing dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside, there was no obvious path for fluid ingress other than the cut ends that were made during the explanted process. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, aluminum, sulphur and calcium. Refer to attached eds sheet for additional information. The melted appearance on some of the quadfilar coil strands appears to be related to the explant procedure. With the exception of the observed discontinuity, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.

Manufacturer Narrative
New information changes the suspect device.

Event Description
It was initially reported that the patient had high impedance. Diagnostics were run and resulted in an impedance value of 5208 ohms which did not trigger the impedance ¿ high. When diagnostics were run again high impedance was seen and the impedance value was 5352 ohms. High impedance triggers at 5300 ohms. There was no reported trauma or manipulation. Diagnostics were within normal limits on (b)(6) 2012 with an impedance value of 2460 ohms. Follow-up indicated that x-rays were taken and per the physician it did not appear that the lead pin was fully inserted as it could not be seen past the connector block. X-rays were not provided to the manufacturer for review. Surgery is likely but has not occurred. No further information was provided. Review of manufacturing records confirmed there were no unresolved non conformances found with the generator and lead prior to distribution.

Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.

Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent surgery on (b)(6) 2013. It was reported that the lead pin was fully inserted into the generator header and was not the cause of the lead impedance. It was reported that the lead impedance was resolved with lead replacement and the generator was not replaced. The explanted lead was returned to manufacturer for analysis. Analysis is underway, but has not been completed to date.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3188480
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #6 on: December 29, 2018, 01:41:39 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 11/06/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6), 2013 it was reported that the patient underwent generator replacement that day and during surgery, high impedance was discovered. The patient was scheduled for a lead revision surgery on (b)(6) 2013. It was reported that the patient¿s generator had been prophylactically replaced on (b)(6)2013 and the lead replaced on (b)(6) 2013 due to the high impedance observed during the prophylactic generator replacement surgery. After replacement, system diagnostics showed results within normal limits. The explanted products have not been returned for product analysis to date. Generator replacement captured on mfr. Report # 1644487-2011-01493. Device manufacturing records were reviewed. Review of manufacturing records confirmed that the lead passed all functional tests prior to distribution.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
Analysis of the lead was completed on (b)(4) 2014. Note that the electrodes were not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. During the visual analysis the (-) connector pin quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 172mm from the end of the connector boot. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as having evidence of being worn to the point of fracture with flat spots on the coil surface. What appeared to be pitting was observed on one of the broke coil strands. It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting on one of the broken coil strands. Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution. The abraded opening and slice marks found on the outer silicone tubing, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the outer silicone tubing. The abraded opening found on the (-) connector pin inner silicone tubing most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the inner silicone tubing. There was no obvious path found for the fluid ingress observed inside the (+) connector ring inner silicone tubing. What appeared to be white deposits were observed on one of the inner silicone tubes. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, potassium, sulphur and calcium. With the exception of the observed discontinuity, the condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3494941
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #7 on: December 29, 2018, 01:42:30 AM »

Model Number 300-20
Event Date 11/06/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
Analysis of the generator was completed on (b)(4) 2013. The device performed according to functional specification. Analysis of the generator in the pa lab concluded that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found. Analysis of the lead was completed on (b)(4) 2013. Note that a portion of the lead assembly (body) including the electrodes was not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. During the visual analysis of the returned 309mm portion the unmarked connector pin quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 87mm and 98mm from the connector bifurcation. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the (-) unmarked connector pin quadfilar coil break (and identified the areas as having evidence of being worn to the point of fracture with flat spots, pitting and residual material on the coil surface. It is unknown if the breaks occurred while stimulation was present due to the absence of metal pitting on the broken coil wire surfaces. The abraded openings found on the outer and inner silicone tubes and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the outer and inner silicone tubes. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, potassium, iron, aluminum, sulphur and calcium. With the exception of the observed discontinuities the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pins provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent generator and lead replacement due to high impedance. It was reported that the generator was programmed off after observing the high impedance. It is unknown if any trauma or patient manipulation occurred that could have caused or contributed to the high impedance. X-rays were not taken. The generator and lead were received by device manufacturer for analysis on 11/21/2013. Analysis is underway, but has not been completed to date. The implant card was received and indicated that the lead was replaced due to a lead break.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device manufacturing records were reviewed. Review of manufacturing records of the lead confirmed all quality tests were passed prior to distribution. Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3497158
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #8 on: December 29, 2018, 01:45:10 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 02/01/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Manufacturer Narrative
Describe event or problem: supplemental mdr #3 incorrectly reported that the high impedance was observed in 2012, when in fact, it was only observed in 2013.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2016, it was reported that low impedance with <600 ohms was observed on patient's device. Possible causes were discussed and patient manipulation was ruled out. X-rays were planned to be sent for review. Programming history for the device was reviewed. The device was temporarily disabled sometime after (b)(6) 2012 till (b)(6) 2013 due to high impedance. It is suspected that the current low impedance may be related to the previous high impedance observed in 2012. No known product replacements have occurred to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device manufacturing records were reviewed. Review of manufacturing records of the lead confirmed all quality tests were passed prior to distribution.
 
Event Description
It was reported that interrogation of the device resulted in high impedance >10,000 ohms. It was reported that the patient underwent generator replacement in (b)(6) 2012. The patient has been experiencing an increase in seizures and behaviors. The patient is being evaluated for replacement surgery. The patient was sent for neck and chest x-rays which were reviewed by the radiologist. The radiologist's review noted that the patient was experiencing neck pain. The review identified that the lead appears to be intact over the left lateral chest. The lead was coiled and was difficult to evaluate. Clinic notes dated (b)(6) 2013 noted that the patient's seizures have increased since the last visit in (b)(6) 2012. It was reported that the did well for several months following the last visit; however, 2 months ago she started experiencing an increase in seizures up to three to four generalized tonic-clonic seizures per week. It was also noted that the patient's mother reported that the patient's speech seems to have deteriorated and that the patient is having severe behavioral problems. The notes indicated that the recent increase in seizure frequency may be secondary to the vns malfunction. The notes indicate that the physician reduced the patient's settings from 1. 5ma/1. 8 min off to 1ma/3 min off. Attempts to obtain additional information have been unsuccessful to date. Surgery is likely; however, has not occurred to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure is suspected.
 
Event Description
Lead product information was received.
 
Event Description
Further follow-up revealed that the patient underwent surgery on (b)(6) 2013. During the surgery after the patient was anesthetized, diagnostic tests resulted in normal impedance readings. The patient's head was turned in different orientations to rule out positional high impedance which were all within normal limits. Different programming systems were also used which also resulted in normal readings. The surgeon decided that he will not replace the lead since diagnostics were within normal limits. The surgery was aborted and the patient taken to recovery.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Date received by manufacturer (mo/day/yr), corrected data: 09/09/2016. Supplemental mdr #7 inadvertently reported the incorrect aware date of 07/18/2016. The correct aware date of supplemental mdr # 7 is 09/09/2016. Date received by manufacturer (mo/day/yr), corrected data: 10/26/2016. Supplemental mdr #8 inadvertently reported the incorrect aware date of 07/18/2016. The correct aware date of supplemental mdr # 8 is 10/26/2016.
 
Event Description
The explanted generator and lead were received on 10/26/2016. Proper functionality of the pulse generator in its ability to provide appropriate programmed output currents was successfully verified in the pa lab. In addition, the septum was not cored, thus eliminating the possibility of a potential unintended electrical current path through body fluids, (addressing the allegations of ¿pain¿). In the pa lab, the device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the pulse generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment. Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator¿s output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period. The battery, 2. 992 volts, shows an ifi=no condition. There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator. An analysis was performed on the returned lead portions and the reported allegations of; ¿fracture of lead(s) / explanted / due to lead break / high impedance¿ (lead section) and ¿pain¿ (lead section) were confirmed. A condition was observed that could potentially contribute to the reported ¿low impedance / low impedance message, short circuit condition¿ (lead section) allegations. The ¿increased seizures¿ (patient section) allegation is beyond the scope of activities performed in the pa laboratory environment: however, the observed discontinuities may be a contributing factor. Note that since a portion of the lead assembly including the electrodes was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead. During the visual analysis abraded openings were observed on the outer and inner silicone tubes and the quadfilar coils appeared to be broken. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the connector pin quadfilar coil break (found at 99mm) and identified the area on three of the broken coil strands as having evidence of a stress induced fracture (fatigue appearance) with mechanical damage and no pitting. The area on the remaining broken coil strand was identified as being mechanically damaged with no pitting and evidence of a stress induced fracture (rotational forces) which most likely completed the fracture. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the connector ring quadfilar coil break and identified the areas on the broken coil strands as being mechanically damaged which prevented identification of the coil fracture type with fine pitting. Pitting was observed on the coil surface. During the visual analysis of the returned 160mm portion quadfilar coils 1 and 2 appeared to be broken. Scanning electron microscopy performed on the quadfilar coil 1 coil break identified the areas on the broken coil strands as being pitted with mechanical damage which prevented identification of the coil fracture type. Scanning electron microscopy performed on the quadfilar coil 2 coil break identified the area on three of the broken coil strands as having evidence of a stress induced fracture (fatigue appearance) with mechanical damage and no pitting and evidence of a stress induced fracture (rotational forces) which most likely completed the fracture. Determination could not conclusively be made on the fracture mechanism of the remaining quadfilar coil strand. It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting. Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution. The abraded openings found on the outer and inner silicone tubes and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the outer and inner silicone tubes. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed on the deposit observed on the outer silicone tubing and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, sulphur and calcium. With the exception of the discontinuities and abraded openings, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with those that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified. Based on the findings in the product analysis lab, there is evidence to support the ¿fracture of lead(s) / explanted / due to lead break / high impedance / low impedance / low impedance message, short circuit condition¿ allegations.
 
Event Description
Patient underwent full revision surgery on (b)(6) 2016. The explanted devices have not been received to date.
 
Event Description
Clinic notes were received for patient's full revision surgery referral. Notes dated 7/15/2016 indicate that the lead impedance was greater than 10,000 in 2013 and patient was referred to surgeon for a lead revision. On the day of surgery on (b)(6) 2013, intraoperative device showed that the lead impedance was not over 10,000 but rather was okay at 3069ohms. The surgeon tested the device several times with the different programming systems but all of the tests showed the lead impedance was okay and the lead impedance values ranged from 3060 to 3179 ohms. As a result, the surgeon did not revise the lead at that time. More recently, patient was seen by the neurologist and the lead impedance was less than 600 ohms, and so patient was referred back to surgeon for evaluation and management. A chest x-ray was performed, which showed a lead fracture. According to caregiver, patient's seizures have been increasing in frequency. Patient had done quite well over the past couple of years, but more recently, within the past six months, experienced an increase in seizure frequency. Patient has had no real behavioral concerns until just recently likely related to the vns not working because of the lead fracture. Lead revision is planned but has not occurred to date.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3115964
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #9 on: December 29, 2018, 01:46:09 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 04/06/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
Reporter indicated a patient was having increased seizures and was unable to feel vns magnet mode stimulation since (b)(6) 2013. High lead impedance was also noted with vns diagnostics testing in early (b)(6) 2013. The reporter felt the ¿lead was off the nerve¿ or not connected with the generator since (b)(6) 2013. The patient had no known trauma and did not manipulate the vns. The vns was not disabled. The seizures are above pre-vns baseline level, and are partial-complex seizures only. The patient forgot a dose of medication and had a seizure on (b)(6) 2013; this may be cause of the increased seizures per the reporter. The vns generator is believed to be at end of service per the reporter. The patient had been seizure-free since (b)(6) 2012. The patient had vns lead and generator replacement surgery performed on (b)(6) 2013 due to ¿battery/lead impedance¿. Attempts for return of the explanted devices are in progress.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Only a portion of the lead was returned for analysis which did not reveal any discontinuities. As the setscrew marks on the lead pin indicate proper insertion, a lead fracture is suspected in the lead portion not returned, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
The generator and lead were returned for analysis on (b)(4) 2013. The abraded openings found on the outer and one inner silicone tubing and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for what appeared to be remnants of dried body fluids found inside the outer and inner silicone tubes. What appeared to be specs of white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sulphur and calcium. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified. Based on the findings in the product analysis lab, there is no evidence to suggest a discontinuity in the returned portions of the device. However, since a large portion of the lead assembly (body) including the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead. Proper functionality of the pulse generator in its ability to provide appropriate programmed output currents was verified. In the pa lab, the device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment. Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator¿s output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period. Magnet activations performed during output monitoring (at a distance of one-inch, spacer block, from generator), demonstrate the appropriate magnet output for the programmed settings. The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters. In addition, a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications. There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure is suspected.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3138009
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #10 on: December 29, 2018, 01:47:34 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 03/07/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
Follow up found that the patient went to the physician's office on (b)(6) 2013 and wanted the vns device turned back on. The physician has turned the device on to 0. 25ma and the patient is feeling some pain, especially when he turns his head to the right. The patient wants the device to remain on because he is having more seizures and is unable to get a replacement due to insurance issues. The patient also reports that he feels a pulling sensation to his neck when he turns his head to the right. The patient reports no seizures in august, but seventeen in september. The physician is aware of the manufacturer's recommendations to keep the device off, but has elected to turn it back on to a low setting.
 
Event Description
Additional programming/diagnostic history from the manufacturer's database was reviewed which confirmed the high impedance observed on (b)(6) 2013. It does not appear that the device was programmed off on this date, but there was no history following (b)(6) 2013.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient presented for follow up on (b)(6) 2013 at the neurologist's office and high lead impedance was observed. The patient was reporting discomfort in the neck when he turns her head to the left, when lifting things, but not during stimulation on-times. There was no specific cause for the high lead impedance, but the discomfort started about two months prior. Additionally, the patient did start working with his father about two months ago, which does include heavy lifting. There have been no drop seizures for the patient recently. The patient's father thinks that the lifting could be the cause, but the physician is not sure since he is a new patient. The device will be left on at patient's request since there are currently no adverse issues and increase in seizures. The patient is likely going for revision surgery due to the high lead impedance and believed related pain in the neck. The patient was referred for x-rays which were provided to the manufacturer for review. Ap chest and neck and lateral chest and neck x-rays dated (b)(6) 2013 were reviewed by the manufacturer. Based on the x-ray images provided, the cause of the high impedance could not be determined; however, a micro fracture or lead discontinuity in the portion of the lead that could not be assessed cannot be ruled out. Additional information received on (b)(4) 2013 indicates the physician states there is nothing obvious to be causing the pain. There are no interventions planned to date. The patient has not reported any complaints. Although surgery may occur in the future, it has not occurred to date.
 
Event Description
Analysis of the generator was completed on (b)(4) 2014. The generator performed according to functional specifications. During the product analysis there were no anomalies found with the pulse generator. Analysis of the lead was completed on (b)(4) 2014. During the visual analysis of the returned 30mm portion quadfilar coil 1 appeared to be broken approximately 1mm from the proximal end of the anchor tether. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as being mechanically damaged with pitting which prevented identification of the coil fracture type. Pitting was observed on the coil surface. It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting. Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution. The abraded openings found on the outer silicone tubing and one inner silicone tubing and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the outer and one inner silicone tubing. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, potassium, aluminum, sulphur and calcium. Refer to attached eds sheet for additional information. With the exception of the observed discontinuity the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified. Te that since the (+) white and (-) green electrodes were not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was seen by the treating neurologist on (b)(6) 2013. The patient's device was disabled at the visit due to a couple of reasons. The patient was experiencing discomfort in the neck (lead site). Per the patient, he experiences a "weird feeling" when he turns to the left. The patient and caregiver were unsure about if the discomfort was associated with vns stimulation when asked. The patient's device was disabled partly as a result of this. Additionally, the patient has been experiencing an increase in seizures over the past few months that are both above and below pre-vns baseline levels. The physician was still not sure the relationship of the increased seizures to vns because at the same time as the high impedance, the patient also had multiple changes in brand name medications, was switched to generic medications and also switched physicians and had a lack of care at one point. The physician thinks there are too many factors and decided to disable the device to have a better idea of the situation. Over the last few months, the seizures have been more than the patient is used to experience prior to vns. It was planned to switch the patient back to brand name medication, but no other interventions were planned at this time. Vns magnet mode was left on for rescue purposes if necessary; however, the patient stated that it does make his neck discomfort more pronounced when he swipes it. Due to insurance reasons, the patient has not been scheduled for surgery thus far. The physician was to re-evaluate the patient the following month.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received stating that the vns patient was scheduled for surgery. The patient underwent generator and lead replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014 due to high impedance. During surgery, the surgeon noted a suture above the electrode and dark areas on the nerve at the initial lead implant site. The patient¿s generator was replaced and the replacement generator was tested with the existing lead. Diagnostic results showed high impedance (impedance value >= 10,000 ohms). The patient¿s lead was replaced and diagnostic results showed lead impedance within normal limits for the replacement devices. The explanted generator and lead have been returned to the manufacturer where analysis is currently underway.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer reviewed x-rays of implanted devices. Review of manufacturer device history records performed. Review of manufacturer device history records confirmed all quality tests were passed for the lead prior to distribution. X-rays reviewed by manufacturer, no gross lead discontinuities visualized. Device failure is suspected, but has not caused or contributed to a death or serious injury.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3036493
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #11 on: December 29, 2018, 01:48:36 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 07/20/2006
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
It was initially found while reviewing programming history for the patient that the patient had high impedance on (b)(6) 2006. The patient had their generator turned off (b)(6) 2007, unknown if related to the high impedance. The generator and lead were returned to the manufacturer for evaluation. Product analysis is planned but has not been completed. Good faith attempts for additional information have been unsuccessful to date.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that physician¿s office did not have information or records from the high impedance in 2006. Product analysis was completed on the generator and lead. The generator output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment. Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator¿s output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period. The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters. In addition, a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications. There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator. Note that the majority of the lead assembly (body) including the electrodes was not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, sulphur and calcium. The condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. The resistance measurement taken during decontamination verified an electrical and mechanical contact between the generator and connector pin at one point in time. Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, during the visual analysis, with no discontinuities identified. Based on the findings in the product analysis lab, there is no evidence to suggest an anomaly with the returned portion of the device. Note that since the majority of the lead assembly (body), including the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Only a portion of the lead was returned for analysis which did not reveal any anomalies. Device failure is suspected in the lead portion not returned, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of programming history.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3041379
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #12 on: December 29, 2018, 01:49:27 AM »

Model Number 101
Event Date 04/25/2012
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
Product analysis for the explanted lead was approved on (b)(6) 2012. The electrodes were not returned for analysis, and therefore, a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. The incision marks found on the outer silicone tubing, most likely provided the leakage path for what appeared to be remnants of dried body fluids found inside the outer silicone tubing. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy - provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing sodium, phosphorus, sulfur, molybdenum and calcium. The condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, during the visual analysis, with no discontinuities identified. Based on the findings in the product analysis lab, there is no evidence to suggest an anomaly with the returned portion of the device which may have contributed to the stated complaint. Product analysis for the explanted generator was approved on (b)(6) 2012. The generator was confirmed to be at end of service: an open can measurement of the battery voltage determined that the battery was depleted. The end of service condition was the result of normal, expected battery depletion based on the battery life calculation. The device performed according to functional specifications. Analysis of the generator in the pa lab concluded that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found with the generator. On (b)(6) 2012, the patient's physician reported that the patient had not been seen and did not have any information. The physician was unaware that the patient underwent explant. Attempts for additional information have been unsuccessful to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Review of programming/device diagnostic history performed.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2012, a nurse reported that this vns patient was being referred for explant for an unknown reason. Follow up with the physician's office on (b)(6) 2012 showed that the patient recently presented with pain at the generator site and an indication that the patient's stimulator was not working. It was also stated that the patient never really received adequate therapy from vns. The patient underwent explant surgery on (b)(6) 2012. The explanted lead and generator were received on (b)(6) 2012 and are currently undergoing product analysis. A battery life calculation was performed on (b)(6) 2012. The years to eri = yes was negative. Attempts for additional information have been unsuccessful to date.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=2597198
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #13 on: December 29, 2018, 01:50:26 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 02/27/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
The patient had their lead replaced on (b)(6) 2013 and their explanted product has been returned for analysis. Analysis completion is pending.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of programming history. Device manufacturing records were reviewed. Review of manufacturing records confirmed that the lead passed all functional prior to distribution. Device failure is suspected but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
Notes from the patient's (b)(6) 2013 surgery were received on (b)(4) 2013. The device was reportedly not functioning for several years. (this was clarified to mean the device was at end of service). In surgery, the generator was disconnected and a new unit was connected to the existing lead. Testing showed impedance: the device was rechecked and retested. Inspection of the lead showed a longitudinal linear separation in the plastic around the metallic wires. While the wires themselves were grossly intact and there was no side of disconnect or fracture, the sheath around the wires appeared to have been worn down and split in a linear distribution. The plastic itself appeared to have eroded away from the wires. The lead was not replaced at this time. The generator was sewn into place. Lead revision is still likely but has not taken place.
 
Event Description
The lead analysis was completed on (b)(4) 2013. Analysis of the lead showed that the electrodes were not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. Visual analysis of the returned 309 mm portion showed abraded openings on the outer and inner silicone tubing in some areas. Visual analysis found that the quadfilar coil one appeared to be burnt in half in the body area of the returned lead portion. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the burnt area as having the appearance of being melted, with re-solidified material (evidence of being melted at one time). Based on the obvious signs of mechanical damage on the coil surfaces, it is possible the thermally-damaged coils were exposed to a high temperature device such as a cauterizing tool (electrosurgical unit) during the explant of this lead. During the visual analysis of the returned 309 mm portion quadfilar coil two appeared to be broken approximately 211 mm from the end of the cut outer / inner silicone tubes. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as having extensive pitting which prevented identification of the coil fracture type and mechanical damage. During the visual analysis of the returned 309 mm portion quadfilar coil two appeared to be broken approximately 250 mm from the end of the cut outer / inner silicone tubes. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as having evidence of a stress induced fracture (fatigue appearance) with mechanical damage, residual material and no pitting. Pitting was observed on the coil surface. It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting. Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution. The abraded openings found on the outer and inner silicone tubing two and the torn ends observed on both of the inner silicone tubes, most likely provided the leakage path for what appeared to be remnants of dried body fluids found inside the outer and inner silicone tubes. What appeared to be white deposits were observed on the connector boot. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, potassium, sulphur and calcium. With the exception of the observed discontinuity, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) /2013, it was reported that high impedance was seen during generator revision due to end of service. The surgeon performed a generator diagnostic on the newly implanted generator. The generator was then reconnected to the lead ensuring that the pin was past the connector block and fully inserted. Diagnostics again showed high impedance. The surgeon inspected the portion of the lead that was able to be visualized, and a break was seen with fluid in the tubing. The lead was not replaced at this time. No patient manipulation or trauma was suspected, no x-rays were taken, and the explanted generator was discarded. The new generator was not programmed on. The last known diagnostics indicated a system diagnostic with dcdc=2 approximately two years prior. The patient was lost to follow-up; however, the patient had been experiencing an increase in seizures six months prior (below baseline), and the resident generator could not be interrogated or programmed because it was at end of service. The patient could not feel normal mode or magnet mode stimulation. The patient's physician believed the increase was due to loss of therapy. A blc at this time indicated negative results. Lead revision is likely but has not taken place.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=2983386
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #14 on: December 29, 2018, 01:51:27 AM »

Model Number 102
Event Date 09/12/2014
Event Type  Injury   
Event Description
It was reported that the patient demanded the vns to be explanted. It was reported that the vns did not meet the patient's expectations and that the patient experienced shortness of breath during sports. It was reported that during sports the patient was disturbed when his colleagues saw the implanted device. Since the patient did not experience efficacy he wanted to be explanted. The patient underwent generator and partial lead explant (leaving electrodes). The explanted generator and lead portion were received for analysis. Analysis is underway, but has not been completed to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative

Event Description
Analysis of the generator was completed on 10/09/2014. The device performed according to functional specifications. Analysis in the pa lab concluded proper functionality of the pulse generator and that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found. Analysis of the lead was completed on 10/09/2014. Note that the lead assembly (body) including the electrode section was not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. White deposits were observed on the connector boot. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy - provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, aluminum, sulphur, zirconium and calcium. The condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, during the visual analysis, with no discontinuities identified.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=4164063
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #15 on: December 29, 2018, 01:52:54 AM »

Model Number 101
Device Problem Insufficient Information
Event Date 07/02/2015
Event Type  Death   
Event Description
An analysis was performed on the returned lead portions. Note that the lead assembly (body) including the electrodes was not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy - provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed on the deposit observed on the unmarked connector boot and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, sulphur and calcium. The condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pins provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified. Based on the findings in the product analysis lab, there is no evidence to suggest an anomaly with the returned portions of the device. Note that since the lead assembly (body) including the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.
 
Event Description
An analysis was performed on the explanted generator, the device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment. Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator's output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period. The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters. Analysis in the pa lab concluded proper functionality of the generator and that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a vns patient died. No information is available to date regarding the circumstances around the patient's death. Review of manufacturing records confirmed that the lead passed all functional tests prior to distribution. The vns system was explanted postmortem. The explanted devices were received by the manufacturer; analysis of the devices is underway, but it has not been completed to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative

Event Description
Review of available vns device programming history by the manufacturer indicates that the device was switched off on (b)(6) 2006. The explanted device was received by the manufacturer as programmed off and analysis showed the battery was not depleted. There is no evidence from the available information the device was ever turned on again and the patient was most likely not receiving vns therapy at the time of the death.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=5406289
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #16 on: December 30, 2018, 05:16:55 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 10/18/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
Initially, it was reported that the patient was underwent generator and lead explant due to being seizure free with medication. It was reported that the patient's generator had been programmed off for about 18 months for that reason. The patient requested that the device be explanted. The generator and lead were returned for analysis. Analysis of the lead was completed on (b)(4) 2013. Note that the electrodes were not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. The incision mark and abraded openings found on the outer silicone tubing, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the outer silicone tubing. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, zirconium, sulphur and calcium. Abraded inner tubing openings were observed. With the exception of the abraded openings, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, with no discontinuities identified. Analysis of the generator was completed on (b)(4) 2013. There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3577015
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #17 on: December 31, 2018, 09:08:06 AM »

Model Number 304-20
Event Date 02/06/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Manufacturer Narrative

Event Description
Implant information on a hospital form was received by the manufacturer which confirmed that the patient had lead replacement on (b)(6) 2013. Follow-up with the surgeon¿s office confirmed that both the generator and lead were replaced per the operative notes. The explanted generator and lead were received by the manufacturer for analysis on (b)(4) 2013. However, product analysis has not been completed to date. The return product form listed the reason for replacement as ¿fractured vns electrode lead. ¿.
 
Event Description
On (b)(4) 2013 product analysis was completed on the explanted lead. A portion of the lead assembly (body) including the electrodes was not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. During the visual analysis discoloration was observed on the (-) connector pin quadfilar coil and the coil appeared to be broken approximately 160 mm from the end of the connector boot and in several sections past the observed coil break. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the areas as having extensive pitting which prevented identification of the coil fracture type with mechanical damage and residual material. An attempt was not made to remove the residual material from the coil surface, since the coil appeared to be too fragile. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the residual material as containing sodium, chromium, silicone, sulphur and aluminum. Refer to attached eds sheet for additional information. It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting. Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution. What appeared to be residual material was observed in various locations. The abraded opening found on the outer silicone tubing, most likely provided the leakage path for what appeared to be remnants of dried body fluids found inside the outer silicone tubing. For the observed inner tubing fluid remnants, there was no obvious path for fluid ingress other than the cut ends that were made during the explanted process. With the exception of the observed discontinuities, the condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified. On (b)(4) 2013 product analysis was completed on the explanted generator. Results of diagnostic testing indicated the device was operating properly. Electrical test showed that the pulse generator was operating within specification. There were no adverse functional, mechanical, or visual issues identified with the returned generator. The impedance check performed by the generator showed that the impedance went from 7810 ohms to 10152 ohms on (b)(6) 2013.
 
Event Description
Clinic notes dated (b)(6) 2013 were received for the patient¿s referral for vns revision surgery. The notes indicated that the patient had been seizure-free since temporal lobectomy surgery with the last (third) resective surgery performed in (b)(6) 2012. The patient was last seen in clinic on (b)(6) 2012, and the patient has continued to have seizures since (b)(6) 2012. Since surgery, the patient had one seizure in (b)(6), three in (b)(6), two in (b)(6), three in (b)(6), and two in (b)(6). Prior to the most recent surgery, the patients was averaging 1-2 seizure per month. The patent was reported to be tolerating vns stimulation without incident programmed to 1. 75 ma for 30 seconds every 3 minutes with magnetic activation of 2 ma for 30 seconds. Lead (system) diagnostics revealed high impedance with impedance value of 7810 ohms. Therefore, the patient¿s device was programmed off to 0ma, as the physician noted the findings indicated a potential lead fracture. The parents noted they were not sure whether vns therapy had been helpful for the patient. The patient¿s current semiology suggests origin within left frontal lobe and may be a good candidate for consideration of a left frontal lobe surgical procedure. The plan was to keep the generator off while awaiting admission to the epilepsy monitoring unit. If seizure control worsened over the next couple of months, they would plan to replace the lead, and if not, would remove the vns generator and lead. Follow-up with the physician revealed that no patient manipulation or trauma occurred that is believed to have caused or contributed to the high impedance. No x-rays were performed. The patient was admitted to the epilepsy monitoring unit, and seizures were recorded independently in the left and right brain. The physician believes that the patient has benefitted from vns therapy. The last good diagnostics were performed on (b)(6) 2012. The patient had generator and lead replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2013. Attempts for product return have been unsuccessful to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury. Review of manufacturing history records performed. Review of the generator and lead manufacturing history records confirmed all quality tests were passed prior to distribution.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3119565
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #18 on: December 31, 2018, 09:09:20 AM »

Model Number 103
Event Date 07/02/2014
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
Initially, it was reported that high impedance was observed and the patient was experiencing an increase in seizures. It was reported that the patient had recently suffered a fall during ice skating. The physician assistant believes the device was damaged during the fall. X-rays were taken and sent to manufacturer for review. X-rays identified that the lead pin did not appear to be fully inserted into the generator header. The patient underwent surgery. The surgeon opened the chest pocket to check the connection and when the generator was removed the lead pin fell out of the header confirming a generator/lead connection issue. The surgeon implanted a new generator and lead. The explanted lead and generator were received for analysis. Analysis of the lead was completed on (b)(4) 2015. During the visual analysis of the returned 289mm portion what appeared to be rust-like deposits and pitting were observed on the connector pin surface. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified evidence of pitting on the surface of the connector pin. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed on the connector pin rust-like deposit and identified the area as consisting of chromium, iron, nickel, silicone and phosphorus. Another eds procedure was performed on the clean surface of the connector pin and identified the area as consisting of chromium, iron, nickel, sodium, manganese, silicone and sulphur. A definite cause for the pitting could not be determined based on the lead portion returned. No other obvious anomalies were noted except for the set of setscrew marks found near the end of the connector pin indicating the lead had not been fully inserted into the cavity of the generator at one time. Additional setscrew marks found on the connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified. Analysis of the generator was completed on (b)(4) 2015. A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications. There were no additional performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator. The generator decoder identified that the high impedance occurred prior to (b)(6) 2014.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer reviewed x-rays of implanted device. X-rays reviewed by the manufacturer, lead pin not fully inserted past the connector block of generator.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=4576543
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #19 on: January 01, 2019, 03:43:36 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 06/21/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
The generator and lead were returned to manufacturer for analysis on (b)(4) 2013. The lead analysis was completed on (b)(4) 2013. During the visual analysis the white (+) and green (-) ribbons appeared to be embedded in what appeared to be remnants of dried body tissue. This condition may have prevented the electrode ribbons from coming in contact with the vagus nerve; therefore contributing to the reported allegations. With the exception of the observed tissue-covered (+) white and (-) green electrode ribbons the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The slice marks found on the outer and inner silicone tubes and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for what appeared to be remnants of dried body fluids found inside the outer and inner silicone tubes. What appeared to be white deposits were observed on the connector boot. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, zirconium, sulphur, chlorine and calcium. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified. Based on the findings in the product analysis lab, there is no evidence to suggest a discontinuity in the returned portions of the device which may have contributed to the high impedance. However the "as-received" condition of the helicals suggest they were not mounted on the vagus nerve during some portion of the implant life. The generator analysis was completed on (b)(4) 2013. The end of service condition was the result of normal, expected battery depletion based on the battery life calculation, the electrical test results and the bench evaluation. The device performed according to functional specifications. Analysis of the generator in the pa lab concluded that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2013 it was reported that the vns patient¿s vns lead was referred for replacement due to high lead impedance. Battery life calculations revealed that the vns generator had 0. 0 years left til end of service. Good faith attempts have been performed and it was later reported that the high impedance issue was first observed on (b)(6) 2013. The patient did not experience pain or any other adverse events. The office reported that their patient¿s vns devices are not turned off unless they are in pain. Thus, the patient¿s device was not changed to 0 ma. No x-rays were taken. No patient manipulation or trauma is believed to have caused or contributed to the high impedance. However, the physician was not able to provide a reason as to why the high impedance issue occurred.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2013, it was reported that the patient had the vns generator and lead replaced on (b)(6) 2013. Diagnostics were performed which were all ok and the patient was interrogated prior to leaving the operating room to ensure the device was programmed off. However, when the patient came back into the office for a follow up visit, it was found that the device was turned on (reported in mfr #: 1644487-2013-02883). No other information was provided. The explanted device has not been returned.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3242310
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #20 on: January 02, 2019, 01:23:07 AM »

Model Number 300-20
Event Date 01/06/2015
Event Type  Malfunction   
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent generator and lead explant due to the high impedance. It was reported that a new vns system was not implanted at this time. The explanted generator and lead were received for analysis. Analysis of the generator was completed on 02/16/2015. The generator performed according to functional specifications. During the product analysis there were no anomalies found with the pulse generator. Analysis of the lead was completed on 02/18/2015. Note that the electrodes, plus one inner tube and quadfilar coil were not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. During the visual analysis of the returned 314mm portion discoloration was observed on a portion of quadfilar coil 1 and the end appeared to be broken approximately 281mm from the end of the cut outer / inner silicone tubes. What appeared to be a greenish substance was observed inside inner silicone tubing 1 and quadfilar coil 1 appeared to be dissolved in this area. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on quadfilar coil 1 coil break found at 281mm and identified the area as being thin which prevented identification of the coil fracture type and evidence of electro-etching on the surface. It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting. Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution. The abraded opening and puncture marks found on the outer silicone tubing and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the outer silicone tubing. For the observed inner tubing fluid remnants, there was no obvious path for fluid ingress other than the cut ends that were made during the explanted process. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy - provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, chlorine, zirconium, aluminum, sulphur and calcium. With the exception of the observed discontinuity the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pins provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received on the patient's symptoms. The patient was experiencing dysphagia and hoarseness prior to being admitted to the hospital. The patient was then found to have left true vocal cord (tvc) paralysis. Due to a suspected abscess, the patient went into or for an incision and drainage procedure (found to be fluid collection not abscess). A lead fracture was then observed during the procedure with abraded insulation. The patient's neurosurgeon believes the lead fracture caused stimulation to surrounding neck tissue which led to necrosis and the fluid buildup. The neck fluid buildup is slowly resolving following vns removal. The patient is continuing to have hoarseness although dysphagia has improved. However, in his experience, the neurosurgeon believes tvc paralysis will likely be permanent due to nerve damage.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was admitted to the hospital with a sore neck and vocal chord paralysis. Device diagnostics resulted in high impedance. The device was programmed off and the patient was referred for surgery for generator and lead replacement. No additional relevant information has been received to date. No known surgical interventions have been performed to date.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=4453271
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #21 on: January 02, 2019, 01:24:20 AM »

Model Number 300-20
Event Date 07/24/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
The patient's vns device was replaced on (b)(6) 2013 and the explanted device was returned to the manufacturer. Note that a portion of the lead assembly (body) including the electrodes was not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. During the visual analysis of the returned 178mm portion the (-) unmarked connector pin quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 75mm from the connector bifurcation. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as having evidence of a stress induced fracture (fatigue appearance) with mechanical damage and no pitting. During the visual analysis of the returned 178mm portion the (+) marked connector pin quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 56mm past the end of the outer silicone tubing. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as being mechanically damaged which prevented identification of the coil fracture type, no pitting and a secondary break line. During the visual analysis of the returned 184mm portion quadfilar coil 1 and quadfilar coil 2 appeared to be broken approximately 3mm from the end of the abraded open / cut outer / inner silicone tubing. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the areas as being mechanically damaged which prevented identification of the coil fracture type with pitting. During the visual analysis of the returned 184mm portion quadfilar coil 2 appeared to be broken approximately 16mm and 22mm from the end of the abraded open / cut / outer / inner silicone tubing. The coil breaks were observed inside the extending portion of inner silicone tubing 2. After the cleaning process determination could not be made between the two coil break areas. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the areas as being mechanically damaged which prevented identification of the coil fracture type. During the visual analysis of the returned 184mm portion the opposite end of quadfilar coil 2 appeared to be broken approximately 16mm from the end of the cut inner silicone tubes. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as having evidence of a stress induced fracture (torsional appearance) with mechanical damage, no pitting and a secondary break line. It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting. Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution. The abraded openings found on the outer and inner silicone tubes, most likely provided the leakage path for what appeared to be remnants of dried body fluids found inside the outer and inner silicone tubes. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy - provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, aluminum, sulphur, chlorine and calcium. Refer to attached eds sheet for additional information. With the exception of the observed discontinuities, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted except for the set of setscrew marks found near the end of the marked connector pin indicating the lead had not been fully inserted into the cavity of the generator at one time. Additional setscrew marks found on the marked connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. The setscrew marks found on the unmarked connector pin provides evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified. Based on the findings in the product analysis lab, there is evidence to suggest discontinuities in the returned portions of the device. Note that since a portion of the lead assembly (body) including the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during generator replacement surgery for ifi = yes a high lead impedance (dc dc code 7) was obtained once the new generator was connected to the existing lead. The lead was removed from the new generator and reinserted to ensure proper connection and device diagnostics again resulted in high lead impedance (dc dc code 7). It was reported that diagnostics prior to the case showed no lead issues. A lead revision was not performed at that time due to consent not being obtained for lead revision prior to the procedure. The surgeon will consult with the patient prior to lead revision. It was reported that the device remained programmed off after the surgery. No patient manipulation occurred that could have caused or contributed to the high impedance reading. No x-rays have been taken as the surgeon was going to consult with the neurologist. Surgery is likely; however, has not occurred to date. Attempts to obtain additional information have been unsuccessful to date.
 
Event Description
Additional programming history was reviewed. Review of data for the generator that was implanted on (b)(6) 2013 showed high impedance during three system diagnostics on the date of implant. A generator diagnostic with a test resistor was within normal limits indicating that the lead was likely the cause of the high impedance. Review of decoder data from the generator explanted in (b)(6) 2013 shows that based on the last internal automeasure of the device on (b)(6) 2013, the impedance was 3062 ohms; therefore, the high impedance likely occurred on (b)(6) 2013.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device manufacturing records were reviewed. Review of manufacturing records of the lead confirmed all quality tests were passed prior to distribution. Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) date of event, corrected date: previously submitted mdr indicated that the event date was (b)(6) 2013; however, this should be (b)(6) 2013. This report is being submitted to correct this data. Date of this report, corrected data: previously submitted mdr indicated that the aware date was 07/25/2013; however, this should be 07/24/2013. This report is being submitted to correct this data.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
Product analysis was completed on the generator. The generator performed according to functional specifications. During the product analysis there were no anomalies found with the pulse generator.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3295171
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #22 on: January 02, 2019, 01:25:25 AM »

Model Number 300-20
Event Date 04/04/2013
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
It was initially reported that the patient had high impedance on system diagnostics (dcdc = 7). However the nurse reported when normal mode diagnostics the dcdc converted was 2. The generator was recently checked (b)(6) 2012 and impedance was fine with a dcdc converter of 3 but it was unknown which diagnostic mode was run. The patient has not had any recent adverse events and there has not been any recent patient manipulation or trauma. The patient does have drop seizures and these may have caused damage to the device as the patient violently falls during those seizures. The nurse brought the patient back for another appointment to have her generator turned off. The patient was sent for x-rays and the x-rays were provided to the manufacturer for review. Based on the x-ray received there was nothing seen that would indicate there was any damage to the generator or lead; however, the presence of a micro-fracture in the lead cannot be ruled out. The patient will likely have surgery but it has not occurred to date. Review of manufacturing records confirmed there were no unresolved non conformances found with the generator and lead prior to distribution.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Only a portion of the lead was returned for analysis which did not reveal any anomalies. Device failure is suspected in the lead portion not returned, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that product analysis was completed on the generator and lead. The reported end of service allegation was duplicated in the pa laboratory and determined to be the result of normal expected battery depletion, based on the battery life analysis and electrical test results. The pulse generator module performed according to functional specifications. There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator. Note that the lead assembly (body) including the electrodes was not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, potassium, sulphur and calcium. The condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pins provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified. Based on the findings in the product analysis lab, there is no evidence to suggest a discontinuity in the returned portions of the device which may have contributed to the stated allegations¿. Note that since the lead assembly (body) including the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that the patient had a generator and lead replacement. The generator and lead were returned to the manufacturer for evaluation. Product analysis is planned but has not been completed.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3092908
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #23 on: January 08, 2019, 06:06:38 AM »

Model Number 300-20
Event Date 03/03/2014
Event Type  Malfunction   
Manufacturer Narrative
Review of manufacturing records confirmed that the lead passed all functional tests prior to distribution. Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
Analysis of the generator was completed on (b)(4) 2014. Electrical test results showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications. There were no adverse functional, mechanical, or visual issues identified with the returned generator. Analysis of the lead was completed on (b)(4) 2014. Note that the electrodes were not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. During the visual analysis of the returned 197mm portion the (+) marked connector quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 25mm and 29mm from the end of the connector bifurcation. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the (+) marked connector quadfilar coil break (found at 25mm) and identified the area as having extensive pitting which prevented identification of the coil fracture type and residual material. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the (+) marked connector quadfilar coil break (found at 29mm) and identified the area as being mechanically damaged which prevented identification of the coil fracture type with fine pitting on two of the broken coil strands. Pitting was observed on the coil surface. The abraded openings and slice marks found on the outer silicone tubing and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the outer silicone tubing. The abraded openings found on the inner silicone tubes and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the inner silicone tubes. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sulphur and calcium. It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting. Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution. With the exception of the observed discontinuity, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the vns patient¿s device was tested and diagnostic results revealed high lead impedance (impedance value ¿ 8620 ohms) during an office visit on (b)(6) 2014. The patient recently had some slips and falls. The patient underwent generator and lead replacement surgery due to high impedance on (b)(6) 2014. The generator was also replaced as diagnostic results revealed near end of service. The surgeon noted that there was a lot of scar tissue present. The explanted generator and lead have been returned to the manufacturer where analysis is currently underway. Review of the available programming and diagnostic history showed normal diagnostic results through (b)(6) 2013.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3709847
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #24 on: January 10, 2019, 01:03:17 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 03/28/2014
Event Type  Malfunction   
Manufacturer Narrative
Device manufacturing records and available programming and diagnostic history were reviewed. Review of manufacturing records confirmed that the lead passed all functional tests prior to distribution. Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer reviewed x-rays of implanted device. X-rays reviewed by manufacturer, no gross lead discontinuities visualized. Describe event or problem, corrected data: the initial manufacturer report inadvertently did not include that x-rays were received that were pending review.
 
Event Description
Analysis of the generator was completed on 09/23/2014. The generator performed according to functional specifications. During the product analysis there were no anomalies found with the pulse generator. Analysis of the lead was completed on 09/23/2014. Note that the electrodes were not returned for analysis; therefore, a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. During the visual analysis portions of the returned lead assembly appeared to be compressed and twisted and numerous abraded openings were observed on the outer silicone tubing. During the visual analysis of the returned 216mm portion quadfilar coil 1 appeared to be broken approximately 32mm and 36mm from the end of the cut outer / inner silicone tubes. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the quadfilar coil 1 coil break (found at 32mm) and identified the area as being mechanically damaged which prevented identification of the coil fracture type with pitting. Determination could not conclusively be made on the fracture mechanism. Pitting was observed on the coil surface. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the quadfilar coil 1 coil break (found at 36mm) and identified the area on three of the broken coil strands as being mechanically damaged which prevented identification of the coil fracture type with pitting on two of the broken coil strands. The remaining broken coil strand was identified as having evidence of a stress induced fracture (fatigue appearance) with mechanical damage, no pitting and evidence of a stress induced fracture (torsional appearance) which most likely completed the fracture. Pitting was observed on the coil surface. It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting. Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution. The abraded openings found on the outer and inner silicone tubes and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the outer and inner silicone tubes. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, sulphur and calcium. With the exception of the observed discontinuities the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the vns patient visited the hospital due to an increase in seizures above pre-vns baseline levels. The physician reported that the event was related to vns stimulation. The patient¿s device was tested and system diagnostic results revealed high lead impedance (dc dc ¿ 6). The patient¿s device was not programmed off. X-rays and emg were planned but it is unknown it they have been taken to date. Patient manipulation or trauma is not believed to have caused or contributed to the high impedance. The patient had multiple seizure types that all increased. The seizure type, duration of the seizures, post-ictal period, and auras did not change. Review of the available programming and diagnostic history showed normal diagnostic results through (b)(6) 2013. No known interventions have occurred to date. Attempts for additional relevant information were made but have been unsuccessful to date.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received stating that the vns patient underwent generator and lead replacement surgery on (b)(6) /2014 due to lead discontinuity which was reportedly visualized near the lead pin. It was noted that the patient¿s generator was not fixed with a non-absorbable suture, so the generator may have turned while implanted. The patient¿s replacement device was programmed on to previous device settings. The explanted generator and lead were returned to the manufacturer where analysis is currently underway.
 
Event Description
X-rays were provided to the manufacturer on (b)(6) 2014. X-rays dated (b)(6) 2014 were provided to the manufacturer for further review. The generator appears in the left chest in a normal placement. The filter feed-through wires appear to be intact. The lead connector pin appears fully inserted into the generator connector block. The electrodes appeared to be placed in normal arrangement. Part of the lead was behind the generator and could not be assessed. No clear lead breaks or sharp angles were found in the parts of the lead that could be assessed. Based on the images provided, the cause high lead impedance remains unknown. No known interventions have occurred to date.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3772194
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #25 on: January 11, 2019, 01:26:42 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 03/26/2014
Event Type  Malfunction   
Manufacturer Narrative
Review of the available programming and diagnostic history. Describe event or problem, corrected data: the initial manufacturer report inadvertently did not include the review of the available programming and diagnostic history. Relevant tests/laboratory data, including dates, corrected data: the initial manufacturer report inadvertently did not include the review of the available programming and diagnostic history. Evaluation codes, including dates, corrected data: the initial manufacturer report inadvertently did not include the review of the available programming and diagnostic history.
 
Event Description
Review of the available programming and diagnostic history showed normal diagnostic results through (b)(6) 2011.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during generator replacement for end of service, high impedance (9225 ohms) was seen when the new generator was attached to the existing lead. It was reported that interrogation of the device prior to surgery was unsuccessful and the high impedance was not observed until the new generator was attached. The surgeon went to explant the lead and observed that the tubing was "stripped back and exposed down to the wire". The surgeon was unclear if any trauma caused the damage. It was reported that the patient was recently mugged which resulted in bruising; however, it is unknown if this may have caused or contributed to the high impedance. The lead was explanted (leaving electrodes) and a new lead was placed. Diagnostics with the new generator attached to the new lead were within normal limits (1556 ohms). The generator and lead were returned for analysis. Analysis of the lead was completed on (b)(4) 2014. Note that the (+) white and (-) green electrodes were not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. During the visual analysis abraded openings were observed on the outer silicone tubing. During the visual analysis of the returned 292mm portion the (-) connector pin quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 282mm from the end of the connector boot. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area on two of the broken coil strands as being mechanically damaged which prevented identification of the coil fracture type, no pitting and residual material. The two remaining broken coil strands were identified as having evidence of a stress induced fracture (fatigue appearance) with mechanical damage and no pitting. One of the broken coil strands was identified as having evidence of a stress induced fracture (torsional appearance) which most likely completed the fracture. During the visual analysis of the returned 146mm portion the end of the (-) green electrode quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 31mm from the end of the abraded open / cut outer silicone tubing. Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as being mechanically damaged which prevented identification of the coil fracture type and no pitting. Determination could not conclusively be made on the fracture mechanism. It is unknown if the breaks occurred while stimulation was present due to the absence of metal pitting on the broken coil wire surfaces. For the observed inner tubing fluid remnants, there was no obvious path for fluid ingress other than the cut ends that were made during the explanted process. The abraded openings found on the outer silicone tubing, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the outer silicone tubing. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy ¿ provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, potassium, aluminum, sulphur and calcium. With the exception of the observed discontinuities and abraded openings, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified. Analysis of the generator was completed on (b)(4) 2014. The pulse generator module performed according to functional specifications. There was no condition noted during the product analysis evaluation that would suggest any anomaly with the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3771292
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #26 on: January 12, 2019, 01:35:11 AM »

Model Number 302-30
Event Date 03/17/2014
Event Type  Malfunction   
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
Analysis of the lead was completed on 04/22/2014. During the visual analysis the (+) white electrode quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 1. 5mm from the proximal end of the anchor tether. Scanning electron microscopy was performed identified the area as being mechanically damaged with pitting. Pitting was observed on the coil surface. It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting. Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution. The abraded opening found on the outer silicone tubing, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the outer silicone tubing. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy, provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, aluminum, sulphur and calcium. Refer to attached eds sheet for additional information. With the exception of the observed discontinuity, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device manufacturing records were reviewed. Review of manufacturing records of the lead confirmed all quality tests were passed prior to distribution. Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
It was reported that device diagnostics resulted in high impedance and the patient was referred for surgery. The patient underwent generator and lead replacement on (b)(6) 2014. Pre-operative device diagnostics resulted in high impedance. The explanted generator and lead were returned for analysis on (b)(6) 2014. Analysis of the generator was completed on (b)(6) 2014. The device performed according to functional specifications. Analysis of the generator in the pa lab concluded that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found; however, during decontamination an elective replacement indicator was observed. Analysis of the lead is underway, but has not been completed to date. Further follow-up revealed that no patient manipulation or trauma occurred that is believed to have caused or contributed to the high impedance. Attempts to obtain additional information have been unsuccessful to date.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3751483
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #27 on: January 23, 2019, 01:03:49 AM »

Model Number 300-20
Event Date 06/02/2014
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
Additional information was received that the generator and lead were returned to the manufacturer for evaluation. Product analysis was completed on the generator but has not been completed on the lead. In the pa lab, the device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment. Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator¿s output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period. The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters. In addition, a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications. The battery, 2. 945 volts, shows a non-ifi condition. The data in the diagaccumconsumed memory locations revealed that 14. 910% of the battery had been consumed. There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that product analysis was completed on the lead. Note that a portion of the lead assembly including the electrodes was not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. The abraded opening found on the outer silicone tubing and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the outer silicone tubing. The slice mark found on the (-) unmarked connector inner silicone tubing and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the inner silicone tubing. What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy - provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, potassium, sulphur, chlorine and calcium. Refer to eds sheet for additional information. The condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pins provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified. Based on the findings in the product analysis lab, there is no evidence to suggest discontinuities in the returned portion of the device which may have contributed to high impedance. Note that since a portion of the lead assembly including the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.
 
Event Description
It was reported that device diagnostics resulted in high impedance (> 10,000 ohms). It was reported that the patient was reporting an increase in seizures. It was noted that the patient suffers from drop attacks which are believed to be due to the high impedance. It was reported that the drop attacks are normally controlled with vns. There was no recent trauma and the patient did not manipulate the device through the skin. The patient underwent generator and lead replacement. The explanted devices are expected to be returned for analysis, but have not been received to date.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3907422
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #28 on: January 23, 2019, 01:04:41 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 06/02/2014
Event Type  Malfunction   
Event Description
It was reported that device diagnostics resulted in high impedance. It was reported that x-rays were taken and did not identify any lead discontinuity; however, a portion of the lead was not visible. The patient was seen again and subsequent device diagnostics resulted in high impedance (dc dc code - 7). The device was programmed off and the patient was referred for surgery. No surgical intervention has been performed to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
The explanted lead and generator were received for analysis. Analysis of the generator was completed on 01/07/2015. Analysis of the generator in the pa lab concluded that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found. Analysis of the lead was completed on 01/09/2015. During the visual analysis the (+) connector ring quadfilar coil appeared to be broken approximately 233mm and 241mm from the end of the connector boot. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the (+) connector ring quadfilar coil break (found at 233mm) and identified the area as having extensive pitting which prevented identification of the coil fracture type. Pitting was observed on the coil surface. Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the (+) connector ring quadfilar coil break (found at 241mm) and identified the area on three of the broken coil strands as being mechanically damaged which prevented identification of the coil fracture type with pitting on two of the broken coil strands. The remaining broken coil strand was identified as having evidence of a stress induced fracture (fatigue appearance) with mechanical damage, no pitting and evidence of a stress induced fracture (torsional appearance) which most likely completed the fracture. It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting. Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution. The abraded openings found on the outer and 1 inner silicone tubing most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the outer and inner silicone tubing. What appeared to be white deposits were observed on the outer silicone tubing. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing silicon, phosphorus, sodium, zirconium, magnesium, sulphur and calcium. With the exception of the observed discontinuities the condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No other obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure occurred, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
Follow-up revealed that the vns patient underwent generator and lead replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014 due to high impedance. The explanted devices have not been returned to date.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received stating that the vns patient¿s device was tested and system diagnostic results revealed high impedance (dc dc ¿ 7).

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3909752
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 59593


« Reply #29 on: January 27, 2019, 04:35:44 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 09/16/2012
Event Type  Malfunction   
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
An evaluation of data obtained from the generators memory revealed that a >25% change in system impedance was estimated to have occurred on (b)(6) 2012 (3235 ohms to 12832 ohms) signifying the start of the high impedance event. A high impedance warning message was first received during a follow up visit on (b)(6) 2012 during an interrogation of the patient¿s generator.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device failure is suspected but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative

Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event, corrected data: the initial report indicated the event occured in (b)(6) 2013 however, a review of the generator data suggests that the high impedance was first detected on (b)(6) 2012. The information has been corrected in this report.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2013, it was reported that high impedance was seen regarding this patient¿s device. Follow-up showed that the high impedance was first noted in (b)(6) 2013 at which time the device was disabled. The patient was inconsistent with follow-up. At the last visit, many months prior, diagnostics were within normal limits. Clinic notes dated (b)(6) 2013 were provided. The patient was seen after a long hiatus, and the mother reported that the patient was having more seizures. The patient was seen by a different facility two months prior and was taken off of vimpat. Monitoring of the vns device showed likely dislodgement of the leads. It was recommended that the device was disabled, and appropriate adjustments were made. Clinic notes dated (b)(6) 2013 indicated that patient was having more frequent seizures; however, the physician noted that there was a very unconvincing description of the individual instances: the patient had a right hand tremor, and the mother pointed to it indicating a seizure. It was noted that the patient was treated with a powerful combination of anticonvulsants, including a very high dose of banzel. However, dosing and choice of anticonvulsants remained constricted by the interventions of the patient¿s mother who believed that the medications were causing behavioral issues and overlooked the prominent mental retardation. There was no specific injury or manipulation, but this was possible given the patient¿s mrdd and occasional aggression issues. X-rays had not been taken. Surgery is likely but has not taken place.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2013, this vns patient underwent a full revision. The explanted lead and generator were returned on (b)(6) 2013 and are pending analysis.
 
Event Description
An analysis was performed on the returned lead portions. Note that a portion of the lead assembly (body) including the electrodes was not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product. What appeared to be white deposits were observed on the outer silicone tubing. Eds (energy dispersion spectroscopy - provides chemical or element identity/composition analysis) was performed and identified the deposit as containing calcium, sodium, magnesium, potassium, zirconium, silicone, phosphorus and sulphur. Refer to attached eds sheet for additional information. The condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure. No obvious anomalies were noted. The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present. Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified. Based on the findings in the product analysis lab, there is no evidence to suggest discontinuities in the returned portions of the device. The pulse generator was explanted/returned due to "prophylactic replacement". In the lab, the device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment. Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator's output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period. The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters. In addition, a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications. The battery, 2. 963 volts as measured during completion of test parameter 7. 16. 10. 2 (measured diagvbat) of the final electrical test, shows a non-ifi condition. The data in the diagaccumconsumed memory locations revealed that 11. 067% of the battery had been consumed. There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3198957
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
Print
Jump to: