Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  All   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Head  (Read 8580 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 55415


« Reply #90 on: January 14, 2019, 04:33:12 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 04/10/2014
Event Type  Malfunction   
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing device history records were reviewed. Review of the lead device history records confirmed all quality tests were passed prior to distribution.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Review of the available programming and diagnostic history. Device failure is suspected, but did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.
 
Event Description
An implant card was received indicating that the vns patient was experiencing spasms and pain at the generator and lead sites prior to generator replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014. The generator was replaced due to battery depletion.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient has had multiple issues including pain and decreased appetite since the lead was repaired with silicone. The pain in the neck area was intense, and the patient kept ice applied and took medication as a result. The patient had lead replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014. The patient reported on (b)(6) 2014 improved adverse symptoms and feeling much better since the surgery. The explanted lead is not being returned to the manufacturer for analysis.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during generator replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014, the surgeon repaired two large tears in the lead with silicone. Since the surgery, the patient was having difficulty turning her neck. When she turned her neck, the patient became nauseous from pain in her throat. The patient was unable to eat due to the nausea and had lost weight. The patient was also experiencing tinnitus with her head turned and having daily headaches. The patient¿s device was recently programmed on. The patient previously had a surgical consult on (b)(6) 2013 for a possible lead migration. The surgeon determined there was no lead migration and stated that the patient¿s device was working well. Diagnostic results showed normal device function as of (b)(6) 2013. Review of the available programming and diagnostic history showed normal diagnostic results through 11/23/2011. No known interventions have occurred to date. Attempts for additional relevant information have been unsuccessful to date.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was going to be evaluated by another surgeon for a second opinion. The patient was referred for generator and lead replacement surgery. No known surgical interventions have occurred to date.
 
Event Description
The explanted generator is not available to return to the manufacturer for analysis.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3838722
Logged
dennis100
Moderators
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 55415


« Reply #91 on: January 14, 2019, 04:34:30 AM »

Model Number 302-20
Event Date 04/13/2014
Event Type  Injury   
Event Description
It was reported on the implant card that the reason for lead replacement was a ¿lead discontinuity¿. It was reported that the hospital discards the explants and therefore cannot be returned for product analysis.
 
Event Description
Clinic notes dated (b)(6) 2014 note that the patient was still having symptoms after generator settings changes. It was noted that the patient needs replacement of the lead to see if that will help with her symptoms and allow her to receive full vns therapy. It was noted that no other major changes have occurred in the patient's medical history. An implant card was received indicating that the patient underwent lead replacement on (b)(6) 2014. The explanted device has not been received for analysis to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Describe event or problem; corrected data: inadvertently did not include that the lead replacement was due to a lead discontinuity on follow-up report #1.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Review of the available programming and diagnostic history.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the vns patient went to the er on (b)(6) 2014 due to painful erratic stimulation. The er physician and neurologist stated that the patient¿s generator may be at end of service. The patient had not felt stimulation for the past eight months. Before going to the er, the patient was on a swing and was hanging by her left arm. The patient began experiencing painful stimulation at 45 second intervals. The patient was also experiencing tightening in her chest and reported that her magnet was not working. The patient had to press the magnet extremely hard against her generator to disable her device. Taping the magnet over the generator was ineffective in disabling the device. The patient was uncertain if her generator had migrated. The patient was seen by her neurologist on (b)(6) 2014. The neurologist decreased the patient¿s device settings during the office visit. The neurologist noted that the patient¿s voice alteration had significantly increased with stimulation. The patient felt that stimulation was traveling up her ear and around her temple. The physician stated that the generator pocket may have expanded and the generator may have migrated causing the magnet to activate magnet mode stimulation instead of disabling the device. The patient¿s device was tested during the office visit and diagnostic results showed lead impedance within normal limits. Further follow-up revealed that the patient underwent generator replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2014 but continued to have painful stimulation after surgery. The replacement device had been programmed on to the patient¿s previous device settings. A radiology report was received but did not observe any issues with the generator and lead. The patient was referred for lead replacement surgery. Lead replacement surgery has not occurred to date. Review of the available programming and diagnostic history showed normal diagnostic results through (b)(6) 2012. A battery life calculation using the available programming history showed approximately 1. 77 years until eri = yes. The explanting facility will not return explanted devices to the manufacturer for analysis; therefore, no analysis can be performed.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=3840370
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  All   Go Up
Print
Jump to: